Look Busy! 5 Rules for Social Networking at Work

Your boss is worried. And her boss is worried, and so is her boss’ boss and so on… They’re all worried about Facebook and what you’re doing there.

More than 50% the largest corporations in America are so worried that they do not allow their employees to visit any social networking sites at work. No Facebook. No Twitter. Not even any LinkedIn! That could get pretty depressing.

Some of their worry is justifiedeven military officials have been caught posting classified information online. But a complete social networking ban is probably unenforceable, as the US Army has discovered. And in a new survey, we’re finding that over 50% of employees are still using Facebook at work.

Even if employers forbid social networking on company PCs, are they going to monitor what you’re doing on your smart phone?

Banning social media may even lead to a DECREASE in employee productivity. Yes, a DECREASE. Limited social network use has been linked to an overall increase in employees’ concentration and productivity. And companies like Dell have proven than embracing social networking can improve the bottom line.

Now, if your employer bans social networking for security reasons, that makes more sense.

Joan Goodchild of CSO Online lays out some excellent arguments against using Facebook specifically in her article “10 Security Reasons to Quit Facebook (And One Reason to Stay On).” And F-Secure’s Chief Research Officer Mikko Hyppönen refuses to open a Facebook account for security reasons, though he’s a fan of Twitter.

Despite the risks, I believe that shutting employees out from social networks disconnects them from what Ralph Waldo Emerson called “the current of events.” Employers can’t afford to keep employees who aren’t connected to rapidly evolving business climate around them. And employees— in an economy where anything that can be automated will be— shouldn’t neglect the opportunity to develop a unique online identity.

But if you’re going to engage in online communities during work hours, it’s your obligation to be safe and savvy about it. Here are a few specific steps you should take to protect yourself, your employer and your job:

1. Know your company’s social media policy and follow it.
Are you allowed to use social networks on company PCs? How often? Which sites? Should you comment as employee or about company matters? What company information are you allowed to share? Who should you consult if you have a question about any of these issues? All of these questions and more should be answered in your company’s social media policy. If you have never read your company’s policy, do it now. If your company doesn’t have a policy, suggest that they create one. Here are some examples. If the policy isn’t realistic, make a case for a policy that works.

2. Use different passwords for your work and your social media accounts.
Smart passwords matter. Annika has written about the importance of creating and remembering strong passwords.  A vulnerable password on your Facebook account can jeopardize your personal reputation and friends. Don’t magnify the risk by using the same password for your corporate network.

3. Always log off when you leave your desk.
It’s smart security to log off your computer when you leave your desk. This is even more important when you have your social networking accounts open. If you leave your desk with your browser open to Facebook, you’re begging for a goofy co-worker to post a ridiculous status update in your name. In fact, it’s good policy to log off any site when you’re not using it. You probably don’t want the reputation of being the guy or gal who is always on Facebook, even when you’re sleeping.

4. Avoid unnecessary risks.
Don’t click on or forward links you are unsure about—check any URL with F-Secure’s free Browsing Protection. If someone is asking you for financial help or to spread the word about some controversy, check it out when you get home. Most importantly, leave installing software to the experts. If you need to install a plug-in to see something linked off a Twitter page, you probably don’t need to see that page.

5. Think about what you share with whom.
You know that you should never post anything on the web that you wouldn’t want to see in a newspaper. Consider anything that you post —including items you limit to only “friends” or “friends of friends”— to potentially be in the public domain. This list of 11 things you should never do online provides some great guidelines about what not to share.

Things that you’re fine with being public now may seem embarrassing or even painful later. You may wish for all those pictures of you and your ex or the videos of you and your former coworkers at karaoke would just disappear. But they won’t. So consider who you add to which accounts. Maybe you just want to use Facebook exclusively for non-work friends. Maybe you only want professional connections on LinkedIn. Whatever you do, think before you accept an invitation to connect. And on a site like Twitter, where your tweets are probably open to everyone, think before you share anything.

How do you use social networks at work? Do you have any rules to add? We’d love to know. Take this quick survey and comment below.

More posts from this topic

Unbenannt-2

Why your Apple Watch will probably never be infected by malware

On Tuesday Apple announced its latest iPhone models and a new piece of wearable technology some have been anxiously waiting for -- Apple Watch. TechRadar describes the latest innovation from Cupertino as "An iOS 8-friendly watch that plays nice with your iPhone." And if it works like your iPhone, you can expect that it will free of all mobile malware threats, unless you decide to "jailbreak" it. The latest F-Secure Labs Threat Report clears up one big misconception about iOS malware: It does exist, barely. In the first half of 2014, 295 new families and variants or mobile malware were discovered – 294 on Android and one on iOS.  iPhone users can face phishing scams and Wi-Fi hijacking, which is why we created our Freedome VPN, but the threat of getting a bad app on your iOS device is almost non-existent. "Unlike Android, malware on iOS have so far only been effective against jailbroken devices, making the jailbreak tools created by various hacker outfits (and which usually work by exploiting undocumented bugs in the platform) of interest to security researchers," the report explains. The iOS threat that was found earlier this year, Unflod Baby Panda, was designed to listen to outgoing SSL connections in order to steal the device’s Apple ID and password details. Apple ID and passwords have been in the news recently as they may have played a role in a series of hacks of celebrity iCloud accounts that led to the posting of dozens of private photos. Our Mikko Hypponen explained in our latest Threat Report Webinar that many users have been using these accounts for years, mostly to purchase items in the iTunes store, without realizing how much data they were actually protecting. But Unflod Baby Panda is very unlikely to have played any role in the celebrity hacks, as "jailbreaking" a device is still very rare. Few users know about the hack that gives up the protection of the "closed garden" approach of the iOS app store, which has been incredibly successful in keeping malware off the platform, especially compared to the more open Android landscape. The official Play store has seen some infiltration by bad apps, adware and spamware -- as has the iOS app store to a far lesser degree -- but the majority of Android threats come from third-party marketplaces, which is why F-Secure Labs recommends you avoid them. The vast majority of iPhone owners have never had to worry about malware -- and if the Apple Watch employs the some tight restrictions on apps, the device will likely be free of security concerns. However, having a watch with the power of a smartphone attached to your body nearly twenty-four hours a day promises to introduce privacy questions few have ever considered.    

Sep 9, 2014
BY Jason
Unbenannt-3-1

How should we deal with defamation and hate speech on the net? – Poll

Everybody probably agree that the net has developed a discussion culture very different from what we are used to in real life. The used adjectives vary form inspiring, free and unrestricted to crazy, sick and shocking. The (apparent) anonymity when discussing on-line leads to more open and frank opinions, which is both good and bad. It becomes especially bad when it turns into libel and hate speech. What do you think about this? Read on and let us know in the poll below. We do have laws to protect us against defamation. But the police still has a very varying ability to deal with crimes on the net. And the global nature of Internet makes investigations harder. Most cases are international, at least here in Europe where we to a large extent rely on US-based services. This is in the headlines right now here in Finland because of a recent case. The original coverage is in Finnish so I will give you a short summary in English. A journalist named Sari Helin blogged about equal rights for sexual minorities, and how children are very natural and doesn’t react anyway if a friend has two mothers, for example. This is a sensitive topic and, hardly surprising, she got a lot of negative feedback. Part of the feedback was clear defamation. Calling her a whore, among other nasty things. She considered it for a while and finally decided to report the case to the police, mainly because of Facebook comments. This is where the really interesting part begins. Recently the prosecutor released the decision about the case. They simply decided to drop it and not even try to investigate. The reason? Facebook is in US and it would be too much work contacting the authorities over there for this rather small crime. A separately interviewed police officer also stated that many of the requests that are sent abroad remain unanswered, probably for the same reason. This reflects the situation in Finland, but I guess there are a lot of other countries where the same could have happened. Is this OK? The resourcing argument is understandable. The authorities have plenty of more severe crimes to deal with. But accepting this means that law and reality drift even further apart. Something is illegal but everybody knows you will get away with the crime. That’s not good. Should we increase resourcing and work hard to make international investigations smoother? That’s really the only way to make the current laws enforceable. The other possible path is to alter our mindset about Internet discussions. If I write something pro-gay on the net, I know there’s a lot of people who dislike it and think bad things about me. Does it really change anything if some of these people write down their thoughts and comment on my writings? No, not really. But most people still feel insulted in cases like this. I think we slowly are getting used to the different discussion climate on the net. We realize that some kinds of writing will get negative feedback. We are prepared for that and can ignore libel without factual content. We value feedback from reputable persons, and anonymous submissions naturally have less significance. Pure emotional venting without factual content can just be ignored and is more shameful for the writer than for the object. Well, we are still far from that mindset, even if we are moving towards it. But which way should we go? Should we work hard to enforce the current law and prosecute anonymous defamers? Or should we adopt our mindset to the new discussion culture? The world is never black & white and there will naturally be development on both these fronts. But in which direction would you steer the development if you could decide? Now you have to pick the one you think is more important.   [polldaddy poll=8293148]   Looking forward to see what you think. The poll will be open for a while and is closed when we have enough data.   Safe surfing, Micke  

Sep 8, 2014
BY Micke