Will the Google+ gender gap make it… or break it?

If you saw the movie The Social Network, you may remember how it depicts Napster founder Sean Parker discovering Facebook. He spies a female college student who he’s ‘dating’ using the site almost immediately after they’ve woken up together. It’s a telling detail.

Several of the men around F-Secure discovered Facebook did so by looking over their wives’ or girlfriends’ shoulders. This anecdotally confirms what Comscore found in July of 2010: social networks reach more women than men and women spend 30% more time on social networks than men do.

In 2004, I was working at a company that was building a social network to compete with MySpace, which had quickly replaced Friendster as the most popular social network in the world. Our team saw how MySpace courted club culture and built celebrities up as they lured bigger celebrities in. We wanted to replicate this feeling of digital nightlife.

Of course, the theory that women attract men to real life social events has motivated nightclubs around the world to offer discounts to females through various promotions for generations. Thus we decided that it was women who drive the growth of social networks, most effectively recruiting others. Sadly, for business reasons, we never got to test that theory out.

But now it seems Google+ may be employing a strategy that is having an opposite effect: men are clearly growing the network. Based on a 46,573 sample of users, SocialStatistics.com finds 86% of Google+ users are male. That’s probably an overestimation, but an abundance of males is a very familiar statistic to those of us who have targeted beta audiences and early adopters.

When you look at total users, there’s no doubt that Google+’s beta is successful. Some have called it the fastest growing social network ever. And Google definitely has not repeated the privacy gaffes in the launch of its Buzz network, which immediately connected users to Gmail contacts.

By only launching a limited field trial, Google has made Plus exclusive, attracting, as F-Secure Security Advisor Sean Sullivan points out, “…just the type of folks that you want as beta testers.”

But will this beta tester population grow a network big enough to compete with Facebook, the largest social network in human history? This privacy-sensitive decision could end up hurting Google+’s bottom line. And it seems that the search giant is beginning to recognize this.

Google+ has now extended 150 invites to all users of the site, a variation on the strategy that made Gmail a global powerhouse. And users can now invite friends via Twitter links.

But the question remains, since you can’t advertise on Facebook, how do you reach those non-beta users who will make your network social? Ask Tom Anderson your friend from MySpace. He’s advising Google+ to court the influencers that made MySpace such a juggernaut and to do so quickly.

Cheers,

Jason

CC image by: Sean MacEntee

More posts from this topic

842710939_d8f092ed9f_b (1)
April 28, 2016
BY 
Why press freedom matters and how tech can help

World Press Freedom Day: Why it Matters and How Tech Can Help

Finland is home to the freest news media in the world, according to Reporters Without Borders. It's fitting, then, that the annual UNESCO World Press Freedom Day conference will be held in Helsinki this year, May 2-4. Freedom of information is a topic that's close to our heart. We were fighting for digital freedom before it was cool - yes, before Edward Snowden. A free press is foundational to a free and open society. A free press keeps leaders and authorities accountable, informs the citizenry about what's happening in their society, and gives a voice to those who wouldn't otherwise have one. Journalists shed light on issues the powers that be would much rather be left in the dark. They ask the tough questions. They tell stories that need to be told. In a nutshell, they provide all of us with the info we need to make the best decisions about our lives, our communities, our societies and our governments, as the American Press Institute puts it. That's a pretty important purpose. But it can also be a dangerous one. Journalists working on controversial stories are often subject to intimidation and harassment, and sometimes imprisonment. Sometimes doing their job means risking their lives. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 1189 journalists have been killed worldwide in work-related situations since 1992, when they began counting. 786 of those were murdered. Freedom of the press and digital technology are inextricably intertwined. Journalists' tools and means of communication are digital - so to protect themselves, their stories and their sources, they also need digital tools that enable them to work in privacy. Encrypted email and messaging apps. Secure, private file storage. A password manager to protect their accounts. A VPN to hide their Internet traffic and to access the content they need while they're on assignment abroad. F-Secure at World Press Freedom Day It's because press freedom and technology are so intertwined that it's our honor to participate in this year's World Press Freedom Day conference. Here's how we'll be participating in the program: Mikko Hypponen, Chief Research Officer at F-Secure, will keynote about protecting your rights. Tuesday May 3, 14:00 to 15:45 Erka Koivunen, our Cyber Security Advisor, will participate in a pop-up panel debate on digital security and freedom of speech in practice. Tuesday May 3, 15:45 – 16:15 Sean Sullivan, our Security Advisor, will be on hand to answer journalists' questions about opsec tools and tips. One of our lab researchers, Daavid, will be inspecting visitors' mobile devices for malware. We'll feature our VPN, Freedome.   Check out our Twitter feed on May 3 for livestream of Mikko's and Erka's stage time.                 Banner photo: Getty Images

April 27, 2016
BY 
Internal startups are a way for big companies to innovate and adapt.

Why an Internal Startup Could Be Companies’ New Recipe for Success

AirBNB. Uber. These are but two examples of disruptive startups that are popping up to challenge big organizations' legacy mindsets and business models. Digitalization has completely shaken the world, and companies have two options: adapt to stay in the game, or be left behind in a cloud of dust. But it's hard to turn a big ship around. That's why F-Secure's Harri Kiljander, Janne Jarvinen and Marko Komssi believe that a great way for companies to accelerate innovation is to bring the startup model in-house. They've collaborated with peers from other organizations in a new ebook, The Cookbook for Successful Internal Startups. The book is a practical guide to establishing and running an internal startup. An internal startup, they say, is a great route to cheaper innovation execution and faster time to market. And the three have experience to draw on: F-Secure has developed its VPN product, Freedome, its password manager, Key, and its smart home security device, Sense, all as internal startups. The book pulls together F-Secure's learnings as well as the learnings of other companies who use the model. I caught up with Harri, Janne and Marko to talk about the internal startup scene. What is your definition of a startup? Harri: A startup is an organization that is established to build a new product or a new service under a significant uncertainty. Trying to do something new that doesn't exist yet, and constrained by a lack of established processes or budgets or resources. Janne: To me, a startup is the means to build something new and disruptive, and build it as fast as possible, with the intention of scaling as quickly as possible. You're not trying to make something that just a few people can do for a living, but you're trying to build up a big business quickly from something new. Marko: A startup is an entity that is searching for a scalable, profitable business model. It differs from a company in that a company has already found its business model. Why do you want to encourage big companies to form internal startups? Harri: Big companies are really good at doing old things. An internal startup is great way to introduce new ways of working and to try developing and launching new and better products and services. Janne: All companies want to explore new areas, but in the established organization it's difficult to start something new. With an internal startup, you don't worry about the existing organizational structures. From a company perspective, because the startup is not embedded into the larger organization, it's easier to handle and it's easier to see whether it's producing results. It also gives employees the chance to be involved in something new. How has the internal startup model been beneficial for F-Secure products Freedome and Key? Harri: One of the key elements has been the rapid development and feedback cycle - the classic cycle of build, measure, learn. Build something, release it, gather feedback from users and markets, and then adjust your product, pricing, channels, etc. The more rapid you can make this cycle, the higher the likelihood of being able to generate success. Janne: We built Freedome and Key much faster as internal startups than we would have done in the traditional way. The global launch took place just nine months after the idea, and that's extremely fast. Marko: Freedome was incubated in strategic unit, not the business unit. It had more freedom as it was able to work independently, without being under any existing business pressure. What is the biggest advantage an internal startup has over an independent startup? Harri: The ability to access the big company resources, including free labor and expertise. In a big company there are a lot of experienced people who yes, may be stuck with old ways of working, but they still have lots of experience and know about doing business. Marko: Access to the company lawyers, marketing competence, PR, company name brand, social media channels with established followings, etc. A startup has to pay for everything or get the competence somehow, whereas a big company has it in house. And vice versa, what is the biggest advantage an independent startup has over an internal startup? Janne: It's not constrained by a company's mindset and objectives, so it has more freedom. However, once an independent startup gets financing, the people writing the checks will start to want some control anyway, so in that sense it's not so different from an internal startup. Marko: The feeling of ownership. The independent startup team really feels that they own the idea. With an internal startup you somehow still feel that you are a company employee first. So ownership is weaker in an internal startup and that has an impact. What do you hope people take away from the startup cookbook? Harri: I hope people get a spark of courage to establish this kind of exercise in their own established organization. If they're not sure how to go about it, they are welcome to contact the writers of the book and we might be able to help them. Even big organizations can do things fast if they follow the recipes or principles we outline in the book. Janne: I hope people in large organizations see that they can explore new areas using this model. Our goal is to really help people learn from other companies' experiences so that they don't have to learn everything on their own. Read The Cookbook for Successful Internal Startups The Cookbook for Successful Internal Startups was created by the industrial organizations and research partners of Digile’s Need 4 Speed program. F-Secure is the driver company of N4S and Janne Järvinen leads the N4S consortium. Harri Kiljander is Director of Privacy Protection, Janne Jarvinen is Director of External R&D Collaboration, and Marko Komssi is Senior Manager, External R&D Collaboration at F-Secure.

April 26, 2016
BY